|
|
|
|
Part 44 |
|
1 Crown Bible College. Where is Crown College? Knoxville, 2 Tennessee. He drove from Knoxville, Tennessee to here 3 yesterday when Jordan identified him
as a witness. Why did 4 he drive all the way across the state
of Tennessee in to 5 Missouri? Well, one time he was a defendant in this case but 6 not in the battery part. But he came from bible college here 7 so that the eight of you would know
the truth, so that the 8 eight of you would know what happened. 9
So what did happen? Jordan comes in
handcuffs just 10 like we told you. The handcuffs were removed. Jordan and 11 Matt Elmore -- Drew and Matt Elmore
then take Jordan into the 12 dorm and downstairs and sit him on the
couch. Matt Elmore, 13 former student. You've heard from former students. Where is 14 Matt Elmore? If this was true, if Matt Elmore witnessed 15 this, don't you think that they would
have Matt Elmore 16 sitting out there and you would have
heard from Matt Elmore? 17 Don't know. You didn't. 18
So they take him downstairs. They sit
him on the 19 couch.
Talk to him, start explaining things to him. Bo 20 comes in. That's part of his job. He comes in.
He talks to 21 them.
And what happens at that point in time? The
boy is 22 like every other young man who comes,
given soap and a towel 23 and told to go take a shower. That's the way you start. 24 Object No. 1, take a shower. That's the first step. 25
And Mr. Stilley and Mr. Blair between the two of
III - 15 1 them, they can't even get straight
what their story is. 2 You'll recall, I wrote it down. Mr. Stilley told you in 3 opening statement that Bo slammed him. Jordan wasn't willing 4 to go quite that far, so Jordan had
him shoved. Mr. Stilley 5 wants to make it a slam again this
morning. Pejorative 6 adjectives, attack words. Attack words like indoctrination. 7
So what happened? Bo -- did Bo -- did
Bo push and 8 shove him, offensively touch him? You notice the instruction 9 they submitted says offensive
touching. It did not happen. 10 And why do I know it did not happen? It did not happen 11 because Bo said it didn't happen. And Drew Parrish drove 12 here from bible college to tell you
that it didn't happen. 13 And what did Drew Parrish tell you, if
he saw it, he would 14 have reported it. Why? Because
they believe. 15
Know the truth and the truth will set you free. 16 They believe. This is a fundamental independent Baptist 17 institution. They believe.
They operate to save children 18 based on this belief. And they don't need to make things up. 19 If Bo makes a mistake, Drew would have
corrected him by 20 reporting it. It didn't happen. 21
The judge has
told you in Instruction No. 3 that 22 you're the sole judge of the
credibility of the witnesses. 23 And you need to ask yourself or you
will ask yourself why 24 would this young man and his attorney
if they can get their 25 stories straight about what happened,
why did they say, why
III - 16 1 did they do? Well, let's just look at motives. What's the 2 root of all evil. Money is the root of all evil. The love 3 of money is the root of all evil. Money is an obvious 4 objective. Why would you say something to get money? Is 5 that the real reason? I sort of doubt it.
I sort of doubt 6 it.
What kind of person has a lawyer that stands up in 7 opening statement and starts out by
saying this is not a case 8 about religion, I'm a Baptist, Bo --
Jordan is a Baptist, and 9 he's a born again Christian, and then
has his client get on 10 the stand and say he's
nondenominational, and having said 11 that he's nondenominational calls
church indoctrination. 12 Think about that for a minute. Church in this courtroom is 13 indoctrination. It's important. 14
But why do you have a slick political correctness 15 type of attack where teaching religion
and exposing a child 16 to the wishes of their parents becomes
indoctrination? When 17 you have those kind of things, you
have those kind of things 18 when you want to get, even when you
want to retaliate against 19 somebody. Why would you want to retaliate? Well, let's 20 think about this for a minute. Jordan's parents put him 21 there.
He didn't want to be there. They put
him from 22 whatever troubled environment he was
in into a rigid 23 environment, a strict environment. Rule No. 1, get up; Rule 24 No. 2, brush your teeth; Rule No. 3,
clean yourself; Rule 25 No. 4, make your bed; Rule No. 5,
clean up after yourself.
III
- 17 1 All the things that all of us that
have children wish our own 2 kids did. 3
But from a troubled structure to a rigid, one, two, 4 three, four, five, a rigid structure. He doesn't want to be 5 there.
He resents his parents. He resents the
situation. 6 He resents the discipline. He resents the structure. Why 7 does he pick on Bo? Why does he pick on Bo? Well, I want to 8 suggest why he picks on Bo. Because Bo didn't touch him. Bo 9 didn't slam him. Bo didn't shove him. Bo didn't push him. 10 What did Bo do that leads to this
lawsuit? What Bo did was 11 administer the diagnostic test. 12
You remember Brother Sam explained that and Bo 13 explained and Brother O'Brient
explained that when you have 14 your academics, that what you do is
they give you a 15 diagnostic test to see where your
level is, and then they 16 start you at that level. Well, according to Bo after his 17 diagnostic test he had to start out at
the fifth grade level. 18 When he got around to writing his
parents, it was the 11th 19 grade and repeat his junior year. 20
But ladies and gentlemen, you know what stuck in 21 this young man's crawl, what stuck in
this young man's crawl 22 and why we're really here today
besides all these collateral 23 motivations, the money, the structure,
the rebellion, the 24 handcuffs, besides all those things,
you know why we're here 25 today?
Because he had to do remedial work as a result of the
III - 18 1 test that Bo Gerhardt administered. 2
And that's eating at this guy. It's in
his letters. 3 Twenty-eight letters. I can't graduate this year. I'm not 4 going to be able to go to graduation. I have to repeat the 5 11th grade. Fifth grade remedial work. He took the test, he 6 didn't do well. Bo administered the test. It's the only 7 explanation that I can think of. 8
THE COURT: Two minutes, Counsel. 9
MR. OLIVER: Thank you, Your Honor. 10
Ladies and gentlemen, you and you alone are the 11 judge of credibility of these
witnesses. Bo and Drew 12 Parrish, the two witnesses that were
identified by the 13 plaintiff have told you the truth so
help them God, the truth 14 that they live and believe every day. They live their lives 15 based on that truth. They did not, Bo Gerhardt did not push, 16 shove, or offensively touch Jordan
Blair on the 24th day of 17 October 2001. This boy came a troubled boy in handcuffs. A 18 troubled boy who had to have remedial
education. A troubled 19 boy who blames Bo Gerhardt for what
his problems were. 20
When you go back into to the privacy of your jury 21 room and deliberate, please, when you
fill the verdict out, 22 know the truth, and the truth is that
your verdict must be 23 for Bo Gerhardt because this battery
did not happen. It 24 didn't happen. They can't even describe it the same way. 25 There is no indoctrination. There's no push.
There's no
III - 19 1 shove.
There's only right truth and truth. And
the truth 2 is, the truth is like Drew Parrish
told you and more 3 importantly like Bo told you, this did
not happen. 4
And we trust your judgment. We trust
the oath that 5 you took. And we know that after your deliberation you will 6
do the right thing and return a verdict for Bo Gerhardt. 7
Thank you. 8
MR. STILLEY: Ladies and gentlemen, let
me say this: 9 Even not saying anything about Jordan
Blair, if any person 10 goes to jail, they are entitled to a
copy of the rules. They 11 are entitled to know what gets you in
trouble and what 12 doesn't. Even if you go to jail, you're still entitled to 13 the sanctity of your person. A jailer can't shove you or 14 push or however they want to say it or
hit you without cause. 15 That is a violation of civil rights. It's not tolerated in 16 our society. 17
And there's a suggestion that, well, Drew Parrish 18 was just identified here recently, so
we had to call him from 19 outside to come here. Well, he was identified as a 20 defendant. There were depositions done in which the 21 witnesses to this incident were
identified. Surely they 22 can't realistically say this came as a
surprise to them. 23 They knew about it. 24
There's a suggestion that this -- it's just about 25 greed, this is about money. No, this is not about greed,
III - 20 1 this is not about money. If Mr. Blair doesn't get $2 for 2 Tylenol or $200,000, he was wronged. He doesn't like that. 3 He doesn't think that's supposed to
happen in our society, 4 and he wants some accountability. He wants a judgment that 5 that is wrong, that that is offensive
contact. It's not 6
tolerated in our society. And the
amount of damages, 7 whatever it is, that you find justly
and reasonably 8 compensates him for that wrong that
he's suffered. 9
I don't recall saying that he was Baptist. I
recall 10 saying that he was a person of faith. And let me show you. 11 You've got a number of letters here,
and I'm sure you all 12 know that when a person writes a
number of letters or a great 13 deal of handwriting of any sort, they
reveal a little bit 14 about themselves in more ways than
one. And you can take a 15 look at these. But if you need to take a look, those will 16 tell you a lot about the story. You can learn about this if 17 you come to a situation where you need
to find things out 18 because they're admitted into
evidence, they are evidence in 19 this case. 20
Exhibit 20 is an example of why the plaintiff would 21 say that he was indoctrinated rather
than provided the 22 religious training that he expected. What did he say?
He 23 said, here are a few things I've
learned, speaking in tongues 24 is false doctrine. The Christian music I listen to is 25 wicked.
Our church is wicked. The music you
sing is wicked.
III - 21 1 Instruments they use are wicked. Drums, electric guitar is 2 wicked, and the way they sing is
wrong. 3
Now, does that sound like somebody that is just 4 satisfied? Okay. I'm
a Baptist, and I'm just going to do 5 things -- well, just making a
complaint lately, Johnnie come 6 lately complaint about what's going
on. Of course not. He 7 complained to his parents. He told them what they were 8 saying.
And you can see on the back side of the letter that 9 Bo Gerhardt says, "Call and I can
help you respond." So the 10 defendants can't say they didn't know
about this. They did 11 know about this. And when you look at the bottom, they want 12 to make out that this person is not a
Christian, is an 13 unbeliever or something like that. Let's look what he asked 14 for along with work boots. I need a pocket bible. 15
THE COURT: One minute, Counsel. 16
MR. STILLEY: Thank you, Judge. A person who was 17 had no belief in Christian religion
would not be asking for a 18 bible.
And as to the idea about this, the educational parts, 19 you know, there's some things that are
out of this case, but 20 once again if you need to see what he
said about his 21 educational requirements, look in the
letter or you can 22 recall what he said from the stand
about having completed the 23 requirements of graduation. 24
Thank you very much for your attention. 25
THE COURT: Michelle, will you take the
jury to a
III
- 22 1 safe and secure place so they may
commence their 2 deliberations. Here are the last instructions and the 3 verdict form. 4
(Jury sent to deliberate at 9:43 a.m.) 5
(The following
proceedings were held at 11 a.m.) 6
THE COURT: Good morning again, ladies
and gentlemen 7 of the jury. I understand you all have reached a verdict. 8 Is that correct? 9
JUROR SWINEY: Yes. 10
THE COURT: Clerk, publish the verdict,
please. 11
THE CLERK: On Plaintiff Jordan Blair's
claims 12 against Defendant Bo Gerhardt as
submitted in Instruction 13 No. 5, we find in favor of Jordan
Blair. We find the 14 Plaintiff Jordan Blair's damages to be
$20,000. Signed by 15 the foreperson this 14th day of April
2004. 16
Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, is the verdict I 17 have just read your true and correct
verdict? 18
THE JURORS: Yes. 19
THE COURT: Does either party wish to
have the jury 20 further polled or individually polled? 21
MR. OLIVER: No, sir. 22
MR. STILLEY: No, Your Honor. 23
THE COURT: Very well. Ladies and gentlemen of the 24 jury, I want to thank you for your
time, attention, and 25 service. It's not an easy job being a juror. The admonition
III - 23 1 is lifted. You can discuss this case as fully and freely 2 with anyone you choose. 3
We do have a rule within this federal court system, 4 the lawyers cannot inquire of you. If you want to talk to 5 them, that's up to you. You can talk to anyone you choose 6 about this case. 7
So thank you so much for your service. You're 8 excused. 9
(Jury dismissed.) 10
THE COURT: Anything else? 11
MR. STILLEY: No, Your Honor. 12 THE COURT: Thank you all so much. 13
(Court in recess at 11:03 a.m.) 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
III
- 24 1
C E R T I F I C A T E 2
I, Susan R. Moran, Registered Merit Reporter, in 3 and for the United States District
Court for the Eastern 4 District of Missouri, do hereby
certify that I was present 5 at and reported in machine shorthand
the proceedings in the 6 above-mentioned court; and that the
foregoing transcript is 7 a true, correct, and complete
transcript of my stenographic 8 notes. 9
I further certify that I am not attorney for, nor 10 employed by, nor related to any of the
parties or attorneys 11 in this action, nor financially
interested in the action. 12
I further certify that this transcript contains 13 pages 1 - 24 and that this reporter
takes no responsibility 14 for missing or damaged pages of this
transcript when same 15 transcript is copied by any party
other than this reporter. 16
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand 17 at St. Louis, Missouri, this _________
day of 18 __________________, 2004. 19 20
______________________________
/s/ Susan R. Moran 21
Registered Merit Reporter 22 23 24 25
|
|
If you have any questions or comments on this site please e-mail me at drgraves2@charter.net |