|
|
|
|
Part 43 |
|
1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI 2
SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION 3 JORDAN BLAIR,
)
) 4
Plaintiff,
)
) 5 vs.
) No. 1:02-CV-88 CAS
) 6 BOB WILLS, ET AL.,
)
) 7
Defendants.
) 8
TRANSCRIPT OF JURY TRIAL 9
BEFORE THE HONORABLE CHARLES A. SHAW 10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11
April 14, 2004
Volume III 12 13 APPEARANCES: 14 For Plaintiff: Mr. Oscar Stilley
511 Rogers Avenue 15
Central Mall Plaza, Suite 520
Fort Smith, AR 72903 16
For Defendants: Mr.
John L. Oliver, Jr. 17
OLIVER,
OLIVER & WALTZ
400 Broadway, P.O. Box 559 18
Cape Girardeau, MO 63702 19
Mr. John D. Briggs
BROWN AND JAMES 20
1010 Market Street, 20th Floor
St. Louis, MO 63101 21
REPORTED BY:
SUSAN R. MORAN, RMR 22
Official Court Reporter
111 South 10th Street 23
St. Louis, MO 63102
(314) 244-7983 24
Proceedings recorded by mechanical stenography, produced by 25 computer-aided transcription.
III - 2 1
I N D E X 2 3 INSTRUCTIONS TO THE JURY 4 (By the
Court)
4 5
CLOSING ARGUMENTS 6
(By Mr. Stilley)
9 7 (By Mr.
Oliver)
11
(By Mr. Stilley)
19 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
III
- 3 1
(The following proceedings were held outside the 2 hearing of the jury on April 14, 2004
at 9:12 a.m.:) 3
THE COURT: Good morning. Are you all satisfied 4 with the instructions and verdict
form? 5
MR. STILLEY: Yes, Your Honor, for the
plaintiff. 6
THE COURT: Okay. 7
MR. OLIVER: Yes, sir. I hope we did it to your 8 satisfaction. 9
THE COURT: It looks good to me. Fine. 10
Now, I'm inclined to read the instructions first. 11 That's normally the state procedure. Many times in federal 12 court the instructions are read last,
but I'm inclined to go 13 ahead and read these instructions in
case you want to argue 14 them or use them in some kind of way. So that's my 15 inclination to read these first. Any objection to that? 16
MR. STILLEY: None, Your Honor. 17
MR. OLIVER: No, sir, I like it that
way. 18
THE COURT: Yeah, I think it's better. If you so 19 desire, you can argue what they are. Okay. Let's
bring the 20 jury out. 21
MR. OLIVER: Your Honor, I'd again ask,
respectfully 22 remind the Court that maybe the Court
might say something to 23 the jury about the absence of the Fair
Labor Standard Act. 24 I'm sure both of us will mention it,
but they might believe 25 it better from Your Honor.
III - 4 1
THE COURT: Yes, I'll mention it. 2
(The following proceedings continued within the 3 hearing of the jury:) 4
THE COURT: Good morning, ladies and
gentlemen of 5 the jury. We're now going to enter the instruction and 6
closing argument phase of this case. And
the Fair Labor 7 Standards Act portion of the case has
been resolved. So the 8 only remaining issue will be the
plaintiff's battery claim. 9 And so that will be what will be
addressed by counsel in 10 their argument, and that will be the
remaining issue for you 11 to make a decision upon. 12
So the instructions: Ladies and
gentlemen of the 13 jury, the instructions that I gave at
the beginning of the 14 trial and during the trial remain in
effect. I now give you 15 additional instructions. Of course you must continue to 16 follow the instructions which were
given earlier as well as 17 those that I give now. You must not single out some 18 instructions and ignore others because
all are equally 19 important. This is true even though some of those I gave at 20 the beginning of the trial or during
the trial are not 21 repeated here. 22
The instructions I'm giving you now are in writing 23 and will be available to you in your
jury room. I emphasize, 24 however, that this does not mean that
they are more important 25 than the earlier instructions. And, again, all instructions
III - 5 1 whenever given and whether in writing
or not must be 2 followed. 3
Neither in these instructions nor in any ruling, 4 action, or remark that I have made
during the course of this 5 trial have I intended to give any
opinion or suggestion as to 6 what your verdict should be. That is entirely up to you. If 7 I've occasionally made statements or
asked questions, do not 8 assume that because I made statements
or asked questions that 9 I hold any opinion on these matters. The answers to these 10 questions or what your verdict should
be. 11
In deciding what the facts are, you will have to 12 decide what testimony you believe and
what testimony you do 13 not believe. You may believe all of what a witness has said, 14 only part of it, or none of it. In deciding what testimony 15 to believe, you may consider the
witnesses' intelligence, 16 their opportunity to have seen or
heard the things testified 17 about, the witness' memory, any
motives the witness may have 18 for testifying a certain way, the
manner of the witness while 19 testifying, whether the witness said
something different at 20 an earlier time, the reasonableness of
the testimony, and the 21 extent to which the testimony is
consistent with any evidence 22 that you believe. 23
In deciding whether or not to believe a witness, 24 keep in mind that sometimes people
hear and see things 25 differently and sometimes forget
things. You need to
III - 6 1 consider, therefore, whether a
contradiction is an innocent 2 misrecollection or a lapse of memory
or an intentional 3 falsehood. And that may depend upon whether it has to do 4 with an important fact or only a small
detail. 5
In these instructions you're told that your verdict 6 depends on whether you find certain
facts have been proved. 7 The burden of proving a fact is upon
the party whose claim or 8 defense depends upon that fact. The party who has the burden 9 of proving a fact must prove it by the
greater weight or 10 preponderance of the evidence. 11
To prove something by the greater weight or 12 preponderance of the evidence is to
prove that it is more 13 likely true than not true. It is determined by considering 14 all of the evidence and deciding which
evidence is more 15 believable. If on any issue in the case the evidence is 16 equally balanced, you cannot find that
issue has been proved. 17 The greater weight or preponderance of
the evidence is not 18 necessarily determined by the greater
number of witnesses or 19 exhibits a party has presented. You may have heard the term 20 proof beyond a reasonable doubt. That is a stricter standard 21 which applies in criminal cases. It does not apply in civil 22 cases such as this. You should, therefore, put it out of 23 your minds. 24
Your verdict must be for plaintiff if you believe: 25 First -- and the only remaining
defendant in this case is Bo
III
- 7 1 Gerhardt, so let me say that also. Your verdict must be for 2 plaintiff if you believe defendant
intentionally pushed 3 plaintiff. And second, defendant thereby caused a contact 4 with the plaintiff which was offensive
to plaintiff. And 5 third, such contact would be offensive
to a reasonable 6 person. 7
If you find in favor of Plaintiff Jordan Blair and 8 against Defendant Bo Gerhardt, then
you must award Jordan 9 Blair such sum as you believe will
fairly and justly 10 compensate Jordan Blair for damage you
believe Jordan Blair 11 sustained as a direct result of the
occurrences mentioned in 12 the evidence. 13
In conducting your deliberations and returning a 14 verdict, there's certain rules that
you must follow. First, 15 when you go to your jury room you must
select one of your 16 members to act as your foreperson. That person will preside 17 over your discussions and speak for
you here in court. 18
Second, it is your duty as jurors to discuss this 19 case with one another in your jury
room. You should try to 20 reach agreement if you can do so
without violence to 21 individual judgment because your
verdict must be unanimous. 22
Each of you must make your own conscientious 23 decision, but only after you have
considered all of the 24 evidence, discussed it fully with your
fellow jurors, and 25 listened to the views of your fellow
jurors. Do not be
III
- 8 1 afraid to change your opinions if the
discussion persuades 2 you that you should, but do not come
to a decision simply 3 because the other jurors think that it
is right or simply to 4 reach a verdict. Remember at all times that you are not 5 partisans, you are judges, judges of
the facts. Your sole 6 interest is to seek the truth from the
evidence in the case. 7
Third, if you
need to communicate with me during 8 your deliberations you may send a note
to me through the 9 marshal or bailiff signed by one or
more of you jurors and 10 I'll respond as soon as possible
either in writing or orally 11 here in open court. 12
Remember that you should not tell anyone including 13 me how your votes stand numerically. Your verdict must be 14 based solely on the evidence and the
law which has been given 15 in the instructions. Your verdict must be unanimous. 16 Nothing that I have a said or done is
intended to suggest 17 what your verdict should be. That is entirely up to you to 18
decide. 19
Finally, the verdict form is the notice of the 20 decision that you reach in the case. And you will take this 21 verdict -- form of verdict with you to
your jury room and 22 when each of you have agreed upon a
verdict, your foreperson 23 will fill in the verdict form, sign
it, and date it and 24 advise the marshal or bailiff that
you're ready to return to 25 the courtroom. And you will return these -- these to the
III - 9 1 courtroom with any instructions or
other materials that you 2 may have. 3
We're now going to commence with the closing 4 arguments. Okay. Mr.
Stilley, you ready? 5
MR. STILLEY: Thank you, Judge. May it please the 6 Court, counsel, ladies and gentlemen
of the jury. Thank you 7 very much for your patience and kind
attention in this case. 8 I know this has taken a little bit
longer than you might 9 expect for something of this nature. At this point in time 10 the only surviving claim for your
consideration turns on the 11 credibility of witnesses. 12
We've got the defendant, Bo Gerhardt, saying that he 13 did not commit any battery. And we've got another defendant, 14 Drew Parrish, who says I was there and
I didn't see it 15 happen.
And we've got the plaintiff saying this happened to 16 me. 17
Let's think about this. The plaintiff
stated that 18 he was slammed up against a sink and
it hurt overnight. He 19 didn't say it injured my back and I
was hurt for a long time. 20 He didn't make a big story. He didn't say that anybody else 21 hit him. If somebody was going to lie, would they make a
lie 22 of that nature with that sort of a
story? This story has all 23 the earmarks of the truth. 24
As a matter of fact, in order to explain, even to 25 try to let you understand why did he
ask for compensation for
III
- 10 1 that, I allowed him to explain what's
the difference between 2 this hit and a hit that you take on
the football field. He 3 didn't tell you, well, that was a lot
harder than any of the 4 hits I took on the football field. He said on the football 5 field there are rules. And basically -- he didn't say all 6 this, but basically what he's saying
is I know what causes 7 you to get hit. I know how you keep from getting hit. At 8 Mountain Park concerning this incident
of battery, I didn't 9 know what caused me to get hit, and I
didn't have any way to 10 understand the rules. 11
The defendants themselves say we give the parents a 12 student handbook to the parents. We don't give it to the 13 students. 14
And now, as far as physical injury, what he said was 15 it hurt overnight. That's all he said.
He said as far as 16 mental and emotional distress, what
that caused him to do was 17 be fearful of anything he did because
he didn't know what 18 would cause further injury to him. 19
And I'd respectfully submit to you that on the basis 20 of this when you consider these
competing stories that you 21 should give credit to Jordan Blair's
story and award him as 22 the Court said fair and just
compensation. And I'm willing 23 and more than happy to leave that to
you to let you decide 24 what is the sense of this community as
to what is fair and 25 just compensation for an injury of
this nature. Thank you so
III - 11 1 much for your time. 2
MR. OLIVER: May it please the Court. 3
THE COURT: Mr. Oliver. 4
MR. OLIVER: Ladies and gentlemen, Mr.
Stilley, 5 Mr. Blair. The last three days the eight of you have had an 6 opportunity to participate in
something that's unique to the 7 United States, and that's our jury
system. This the only 8 country in the world that it had
enough sense to entrust 9 decision making to our citizens. We have an opportunity, 10 small opportunities to participate in
our democracy. We have 11 an opportunity to vote. We have an opportunity from time to 12 time to serve in the armed forces. We have numerous 13 charitable opportunities. 14
One of the opportunities that we forget about 15 because it's an inconvenience is jury
duty. In our system, 16 it's a system that has lasted for over
200 years, takes good 17 citizens who by reason of their
background, education, and 18 experience bring a wealth of knowledge
and we let those 19 people, you, decide disputes. 20
You know, they used to do this in England, each side 21 would go out and hire a champion and
the person that had the 22 most resources, the fanciest tools,
they would hire the 23 biggest champion and get on the
biggest horse, and if the 24 defendants didn't have or the
defendant didn't have that kind 25 of money or that big horse, you know,
you've all seen the
III - 12 1 Prince Valient movies, that's really
how they did it, each 2 champion galloped down the road on the
horse, and the biggest 3 and strongest always won. That didn't always produce the 4 right result. 5
So we have a jury system, and we believe in that 6 system.
And that's why we're here because we trust you to 7 hear the evidence and to do what the
judge has indicated is 8 your duty, and that's to decide the
facts based on what he 9 has told you the law is. 10
Bo in particular is grateful for your service.
I'm 11 grateful for your service. I'm an officer of the court. 12 Without you we don't function. Without you we are not a 13 democracy. We appreciate your time. 14
I also understand in this case some of the 15 difficulty you've had because you
heard two days and all this 16 stuff about Fair Labor Standards Act,
which is now not for 17 your decision. The judge has decided that as a matter of 18
law. So the only thing that that
evidence matters to you is 19 as it relates to the credibility of
the witnesses, 20 particularly Drew Parrish and Bo as
relates to what actually 21 happened on October the 24th. And then the rest of the 22 reasons as it bears on who was telling
the truth and why. 23
You know, this lawsuit started a long time before we 24 got here today, before you were sworn
in on Monday. Mountain 25 Park, which employs Bo, takes troubled
youth, troubled youth.
III - 13 1 We have a form that indicates for
every potential applicant 2 what their problems are. We ask a series of things, what are 3 their behavior problems, drug or
alcohol, sexual activity, 4 runaway, wrong friends, failing
school, rebellion, 5 disrespect, out of control behavior
disorders. 6
Now, what Jordan's problems were are not part of 7 this case. What Jordan's problems are are not part of the 8 case.
But when his parents in the exercise of their parental 9 judgment got worried enough to turn to
the institution of 10 last resort starting in October 19th
of 2000, it was because 11 Jordan was troubled. It was -- it was because Jordan was in 12 difficulty in a residential placement
facility. It was the 13 last resort. 14
And when his parents came on October the 20th and 15 enrolled him, it was because of that. They are the ones that 16 were trying to live with him and could
not. And on October 17 the 24th he came to Mountain Park,
what his parents thought 18 would be his choice. And how did he describe that he came? 19 He came in handcuffs, not handcuffs
that we put on, not 20 handcuffs his parents put on. 21
Yet when he came he was greeted by Drew, Drew 22 Parrish, who remembers it because of
that. He's greeted by 23 Drew on the 24th. Who is Drew Parrish? Drew Parrish is a 24 product of Mountain Park. Three years there, junior staff, 25 staff, is no longer employed. He's pursuing his education at |
|
If you have any questions or comments on this site please e-mail me at drgraves2@charter.net |